Herding Cats, the Path to Closure

"Closure" is viewed differently by each of the primary participants in the Criminal Justice System

 
Andrea

Prepare written motions during trial to reinforce objection and to preserve issues

This is not Chicago   ToTo

It's All About Perception

 
Herb

Our work protects the rights of the entirety of our society

 

Role model of seasoned practitioner learning new technology

Particularity in Reading Motions

 

May I be Heard?

Herb's Website with Motions

 

Vince

Ethical Knowledge is Important     It can be our sword

Don't Wait Until Trial to Prepare Experts

Opponents Cannot Invade Attorney/Client Privilege under the guise of interviewing expert

Learn the Ethical Standards of All Disciplines

Methodology of Litigation

Theory of the Case

 

 

Mark
Organize, Organize, Organize
 

Every Jurisdiction is different

Team with Diversity

Prepare, Prepare, Prepare

 

 

Hans
Interview techniques are relevant

Need for Dispositional Facilitator

 

 

Mary Ann
Front load your mitigation

 

Work the System when Money is Tight

Understand and utilize innovative ways to obtain dispositional fairness

 
Maureen
The questions you ask must be clear

You start at the general and go to specific

 

Skip

When you get to the courtroom, your client is on the gurney

Karla

Ask the follow up questions

 

Mike
Primacy is Important
 

You need to redefine Open Statement to Understand it

Brad

Client Centered   v.   Cause Centered

False Distinction

Death Penalty is Not a Punishment

Death Penalty a Part of Political Process

 

Millard Materials

“Case Management” is an Essential Element of a Fair “Closure”

 
 

"Case Management" is viewed differently by each of the primary participants in the Criminal Justice System

Understanding the Universe of the “Case” to be Managed

Universe of Representation

Models of Representation

Team Concept

The Goal of Dispositional Fairness Concept

       Moving the Dispositional Decision to the Earliest Possible Stage

       Client Must be Prepared for Window of Opportunity

Each of the Triers of Fact

The Importance of Time

     Using Early Litigation

     Utilization of Time

Importance of Evidence

     As Element of Time Goals

     For Client Relationship

     For the Record

     To Sell Mitigation

     To Emphasize Cost

Individualizing Systemic Issues

Importance of Personal Involvement

Management Enhancers

    Personal Contacts

Oral Communications

Outside Court

In Court

Communication Techniques

      Telling the “they-lived-happily-ever-after” story

      Talking about Specifics to Communicate Larger Picture

      Primacy and Recency

      REVO, i.e., Relating Back, the Setup, a Continuum

      Enhancing Client Knowledge Base to Include Reality

Technology  --  The Application

Dealing with Documents, i.e. Getting Organized to Rescue Time for the Real Necessities

File and Document Numbering System ― Example a70317   is a March 17, 2007 Document

 

Effectively Using Windows File Folders

Contacts           

Letters              

Legal Research  

Timeline           

Inserting Hyperlinks and Bookmarks in Documents

Bates Numbering of Documents

Sharing Word Documents - Removing  “Hidden Data

Paragraph Heading to Summarize Content

Paragraph Numbering System

See the Index that follows for a numbering system example and Index example

Example of the Summary Type of Index

INDEX

       Preface

1. Factual Analysis

1.1  Summary of Facts

1.2  The [CLIENT]'s Case 

1.3  [CLIENT'S COUNSEL] Began Representing [CLIENT]  

1.4  [CLIENT'S COUNSEL] Filed A Motion To  Withdraw 

1.5  After the Hearing on the Plea Withdrawal, the Court Began A

      Secreted, Ex Parte Investigation

1.6 [CLIENT'S COUNSEL] Next Appeared Before the Court With

       [CLIENT],  Expecting a  a Ruling On His Motion

1.7 [CLIENT'S COUNSEL] Was Held In Contempt

1.8 [CLIENT'S COUNSEL] Had No Opportunity For A Hearing On

      His Contempt and Was Not Afforded and the Contempt Finding

      Was Otherwise Devoid of Protections Afforded by the Local

      Rules, the State Statutes and both the State and Federal

      Constitutions

2.  The Legal Issues

2.1  Sources of Applicable Legal Standards in General in Contempt

      Adjudications

      2.1.1  Overview of these General Legal Standards     

2.1.2  The Local Rule Controlling Contempt Adjudications

2.2  Contempt Adjudication Issues Relevant to this Case 

    2.2.1  The Indirect, Direct and Summary Contempt Issue         

2.2.1.1  Rule of Practice 13.01  

2.2.1.2  Illinois Law  

2.2.1.3  The U. S. Constitution   

2.2.1.4  The Prosecution Should Admit or Deny the Following   

    2.2.2  The Absence of Notice Issue  

2.2.2.1  Rule of Practice 13.00  

2.2.2.2  Illinois Law  

2.2.2.3  The U. S. Constitution     

2.2.2.4  The Prosecution Should Admit or Deny   

    2.2.3  The Hearing Issue  

2.2.3.1  Rule of Practice 13.01  

2.2.3.2  Illinois Law     

2.2.3.3  The U. S. Constitution   

  2.2.4   The Issue of a Jury Trial  

2.2.4.1  Rule of Practice  

2.2.4.2  The U. S. Constitution     

2.2.4.3  The Prosecution Should Admit or Deny.   

    2.2.5  The Excessive, Unjustified and Unauthorized Punishment Issue   

    2.2.6  The Selective Prosecution, Yick Wo v. Hopkins, Issue  

    2.2.7  A Constitutional, Statutory and Commonsensical Analysis of the

            Alleged Contemptuous Act.   

    2.2.8  The Independent Adjudicator and Judicial Misconduct Issue  

2.2.8.1  The Ex Parte Hearing Reason for Another Judge  

2.2.8.2  The Bias or Prejudice Reason for Another Judge  

2.2.8.3  The Rule of Practice 13.01(c)(4) Reason for Another Judge   

    2.2.9  The Prosecutorial Misconduct Issue

2.3  The Duty and Obligation to Disclosure  

  2.3.1  The Constitutional Duty to Disclose  

  2.3.2  Statutory Duty to Disclose     

  2.3.3  Ethical and Expediency Reasons to Disclose

2.4  The Timely Need for and Use of the Disclosure Materials  

  2.4.1  Pre-briefing Disclosure Is Necessary  

  2.4.2  The Disclosure Material Could Be Used For  

            Impeachment   

  2.4.3  The Required Scope of Disclosure  

2.4.3.1  Definitions and Directions  

2.4.3.2  The Following Persons Have Information And  

Therefore Are Covered By This Disclosure  

Request  

2.4.3.3  The Information that is Needed to be Disclosed  

2.4.3.3.1  Materiality of Disclosure Demand

2.4.3.3.2  Disclosure Demand Relating to Possible Misconduct

2.4.3.4  The Method to be Used in Obtaining Disclosure from

      Judge [Circuit Judge]  

3.  Conclusion 

Prayer for Relief

ATTACHMENTS     [Note:  All Attachments are omitted from this Example]

Attachment 1                    [Client's Counsel]`s Motion [filed earlier]  

Attachment 2                    Report of Dr. [________]  

Attachment 3                    Transcript of Guilty Plea  

Attachment 4                    Copy of Sentencing Transcript  

Attachment 5                     The following documents  

•   Notice of Appearance;

 •   Notice of Filing; 

 •   Motion to Withdraw Notice of Appeal In Order To Hear[CLIENT]'s Fitness Petition;

 •   Motion to Stay Mittimus Pending Disposition of [CLIENT]'s Fitness Petition;

 •   Affidavit of [CLIENT's mother];

 •   Motion for Fitness Hearing;

 •   Notice of Motion; 

 •   Order Staying the Mittimus; 

 •   Notice of Mittimus;

 •   Affidavit of ____________;

 •   Motion to Attach Affidavit of __________ to Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea;

 •   Memorandum of ____________;

 •   Affidavit of ____________;

 •   Notice of Motion;

 •   Motion to Withdraw Plea of Guilty; and,

 •   Certificate of ___________.   

Content Checklist for Documents

Preface

Introduction to the Issues

About the Client

Headlines Short Paragraphs

Include Dragnet Treatment

 

Use Concentric Circle Concept

 

Include Photos                   SnagIt 8

Sources

   Ninth Circuit Capital Punishment Handbook 

    Electronic Access to Court Records (Trend)

    PACER  (Federal Courts)

    LexisNexis CourtLink

    Lexis One (Free, All Jurisdictions, for last 5 years)

    Google Earth

Helpful Web Services

     Answers  free online dictionary, etc.

     GoToMyPC  a free trial is available.

     MyDocsOnline is for web based document sharing.

Reasonably Priced Internet Hosts

       Lunar      Globat       TRK Hosting

VoIP

     Vonage

     Skype

Helpful Newsletters about Computer Issues

            Windows Secrets newsletter (free)

            WOODY's OFFICE WATCH (free)

              Karen (Free tools plus newsletter by best computer writer)

              Scot's Newsletter

Computer Equipment How to save on quality equipment

Froogle

Pricewatch

CNET Shopper

Scanners

          Xerox DocuMate 272,     Xerox DocuMate 632

OCR Software

         OmniPage ( Pro 15)

        Adobe Acrobat Pro 8

Selling Cotton Candy Under the Big Top

Supreme Court Petitions and Briefs

Supreme Court Practice

Certiorari

Writing the Strategic Subpoena

Strategic Subpoenas

Without presenting evidence, there can be no Action MotionsY2K9. The strategic subpoena is one of the ignition systems necessary for Action Motions Y2K9. Catchy titles for motions, innovative subject matter for motions and even favorable publicity cannot assure the proper ignition for Action Motions Y2K9.

The strategic subpoena begins to tell the story and accomplish the goals. An important element of the strategic subpoena is the production of documents portion of the subpoena.

An example of a request for documents is the following request used in a post-conviction hearing.

ITEMIZED ITEMS SUBPOENAED

  

1.   All documents relating to the televised CNN Presents segment, “Amazing Grace.” This segment was recorded, in part, in the residence of xxxx on or about February 28, 1994 and was first broadcast on April 9, 1995.

2.  All documents relating to Court TV's involvement in the trial of xxxx.  These include interviews and segments in which you appeared or were depicted between April 7, 1993 and the present.

3.  All documents relating to the WSB-TV newscast which showed you strutting (walking in an animated manner with exaggerated movements of upper and lower extremities) down the hall of the Fulton County Courthouse very soon after the verdict in the trial of xxxx.  

4.  All documents relating to other TV broadcasts, between April 7, 1993 and the present, in which you appeared or were depicted.

5.  All documents in which you appeared and/or were recorded and/or were depicted or described relating to or appearing in radio broadcasts and/or audio recordings, between April 7, 1993 and the present.

6.  All documents in which you appeared or were depicted relating to or appearing in newsprint or other print media, between April 7, 1993 and the present.

7. All documents relating to legal seminars or oral presentations, between April 7, 1993 and the present, in which you participated or presented information.

8.  All documents concerning any communications between you and xx or concerning xx, including, but not limited to, any interactions between you and xx between April 7, 1993 and the present.

9. All documents concerning any communications between you and xx or concerning xx, including, but not limited to, any interactions between you and xx between April 7, 1993 and the present.

10. All documents concerning any communications between you and xx or concerning xx, including, but not limited to, any interactions between you and xx between April 7, 1993 and the present.

11.  All documents concerning personal funds supplied by you to assist in the investigation and/or prosecution of  xxxx.

12.  All documents concerning funds and/or services provided by other than governmental entities for the prosecution and/or investigation of xxxx or any facts relating to the fire at the residence of xxxx.

13.  All documents received by you from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation or other law enforcement agencies relating to the case of State of Georgia v. xxxx.

14.  All documents concerning information relating to the date of any test for accelerants in the residence of xxxx and the date of receipt by the office of the District Attorney of Fulton County of the report for any tests relating to these accelerants.

15.  All documents concerning any compensation, reward or benefit which was provided any persons testifying at the trial of xxxx.

16.  All documents concerning any compensation, reward or benefit provided to any person related to the case of State of Georgia v. xxxx.

17.  All documents concerning the supposed “beatings” Ms. xxxx received at the hands of Mr. xxxx.

18.  All documents concerning other cases on which you worked between the night of April 7, 1993 and the day of closing arguments in the case of State of Georgia v. xxxx.

19.  Copy of your W-2, W-4 and 1099 forms and federal income tax returns for the past four years.

20.  All documents reflecting gifts, contributions, or donations, rewards or awards you have received from April 7, 1993 until the present excepting only gifts from persons related to you by blood or marriage within the 7th Levitical degree.

21.  All documents reflecting gifts, contributions, or donations, rewards or awards you have made from April 7, 1993 until the present excepting only gifts given to persons related to you by blood or marriage within the 7th Levitical degree.

22.  All documents reflecting terms of compensation to you by any entities other than the office of the District Attorney of Fulton County from April 7, 1993 to the present.

23.  All documents relating to any complaints about your conduct as an attorney or about your conduct as a prosecutor in any case during the time you have been employed by the office of the District Attorney of Fulton County.

24.  All documents relating to any application you have made seeking any judicial position during the time you have been employed by the office of the District Attorney of Fulton County.

25.  All documents relating to any application you have made seeking employment within the last five years, including, but not limited to, employment at Georgia State University.

26.  All documents related to classes you have taught or are currently teaching at Georgia State University.  This includes, but is not limited to, lesson plans, course materials, and lecture documents.

27.  All documents you have written about the case of xxxx that are not a part of the official record of this case.

28.  All documents related to written or oral communication with persons who testified during the trial of the case of State of Georgia v. xxxx from April 7, 1993 to the present.

29.  All documents related to written or oral communication with persons about xxxx since April 7, 1993 to the present.

30.  All documents that relate to any justification for you questioning Dr. Joseph Burton about being called “Lying Joe Burton.”

31.  All documents relating to any persons entering the residence of xxxx from April 7, 1993 to the present.

32.  All documents depicting any view of the scene of the residence of xxxx  from April 7, 1993 to the present.

33.  All documents depicting any view or reflecting any test, test results, experiment or simulation that in any way relate to the case of the State of Georgia v. xxxx or the fire at the residence of xxxx, including, but not limited to, the video made during the presence of the CNN crew at the residence of xxxxand the test by xx made before the trial of xxxx of the Neat-Lac burning against a board.

The strategic subpoena is most often accompanied with the following attachment that demonstrates to the court the courtesy you are extending to the witness. The following is an example of this type of attachment.

ATTACHMENT 1 to Subpoena

 

NOTE: Counsel for xxxx are coordinating the subpoenas and documents subpoenaed for the hearing in this case scheduled to begin Thursday, April 11 at 9:00 a.m. through the office of Millard Farmer, P.O. Box 1728, Atlanta, GA 30301, telephone (404) 688-8116; fax: (404) 577-0643.  Someone at this office will be available to discuss your attendance and your production of documents pursuant to this subpoena. Please inform the person answering the phone that you wish to talk with someone about your subpoena for this case. There will be someone available from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.  Persons who are subpoenaed are requested to call as soon as possible with scheduling or document production problems. The purpose of these calls is to arrange for a schedule, not only for attendance, but also a time to produce the subpoenaed documents. The same documents, in some instances, have been subpoenaed from more than one witness. It is not intended that each witness be burdened with production of the documents or items subpoenaed if there can be an agreement as to the person who will supply the document or item subpoenaed.  Persons who wish to be on call for attendance may make this request and everything possible will be done to accommodate both personal and professional obligations and schedules. Please note the time and date on your subpoena; not everyone is subpoenaed for the same time and date. Please call as soon as practical or have your counsel call promptly so that this hearing can be facilitated without a number of people being inconvenienced  by last day and hour requests for accommodations.  It will be difficult to adjust the scheduled time for your appearance close to the hearing date. Please call promptly for the convenience of all involved; however, please understand this requested call is not required by the court.

 

The strategic subpoena is accompanied by a list of descriptions much the same as descriptions used in notices to produce documents in civil cases.  An example of this attachment of descriptions is as follows.

ATTACHMENT 2 To Subpoena

 

DEFINITIONS RELATING TO SUBPOENAED ITEMS  

The following definitions are an integral part of these requests for documents and are applicable throughout this request.

 

"Document", either singular or plural, is defined as any and all originals, or if not available, true copies of all memorandum, reports, appraisals, evaluations, correspondence, receipts, payment vouchers, accounting records and books, communications, interoffice communications, intra-office memorandum, inter-agency communications, electronic recordings including computer generated and/or preserved recordings, video recordings, audio recordings, summaries of conversations, summaries of memorandum of meetings or conferences, list of persons attending meetings or conferences, diaries, records or summaries of interviews, investigation or reports, summaries of negotiations, agreements, contracts, agency rules, agency policies, office manuals, invoices, canceled checks, journals, ledgers, file cards, index cards, indices, deposit slips, data processing cards, computer or business machine printouts, electronic recordings, work papers, statements, financial statements whether audited or unaudited, leases, speeches, information provided to the media, press releases, advertisements, pamphlets, circulars, professional letters, annual and other reports, documents filed with government agencies, reports of experts and research personnel, draft and preliminary copies of any of the foregoing, marginal comments appearing in any document and all other writings and data compilations, including any written, printed, recorded or graphic matter, photographic matter or similar reproductions, however produced or reproduced or tangible things upon which words or phrases are affixed.

 

The effective use of subpoenas in litigation is a little used skill. The requirement to bring documents aspect of the subpoena should be written much as the concentric statements concept in Action Motions Y2K9.

In fact, the subpoena should be a modified motion. It should command the person being subpoenaed to bring numerous items with him/her to the Action Motions Y2K9 hearing to be used as Energized Evidence.

 

Defusing the Political Benefits of Dispositional Unfairness to the Prosecutor and Judge, with Representation Skills

Civil Litigation in Support of Leveling the Forum Used in the Defense to Criminal Charges

Remember, it was those who stayed out of the ring in the coliseum that were not eaten by the lions in ancient Rome.

Taking the Power

Using the Web, as a Defense Tool

Owen Jones  --  NYT article         bio        website

Are you a King Lear or an Advocate?

Herding Cats Windows Medial Player           

Herding Cats   QuickTime

Back to Seminar Agenda
To Millard Farmer Index