Click Here to Return to Goextranet.net

INDEX  

Note An abbreviated version of this Index appears at the left and top  of most pages once you enter the materials. This Index or the side and top indexes can be used for navigation, however it is faster to use the left and top navigation indexes on each page of the materials. 
Overview
 
  A REPRESENTATION MODEL FOR DISPOSITIONAL FAIRNESS Preface
    Overview to Representation Models
    The Need to Identify Models of Representation
    The Economic Models of Representation
    The Technical Models of Representation
   
  THE ADVENT OF THE STRATEGY SPECIALIST
   
  ACTION MOTIONS PLUS Y2K9
    Using Motions to Pursue Goals of Representation Model
    A.  Definitions of Terms and Concepts
  Concentric Statements
  Looping
  Repeaters
  Percolate
  Bomb
  Tantalizers
  Warning
  Dragnet
  “May I be heard?”
Tell a Story
    B.  The Purposes of Actions Motions Plus Y2K9
  1.  Correction
  2.  Education
  3.  Preservation
  4.  Steering
  5.  Information gathering
    C.  Drafting Action  Motions Plus Y2K9
    D.  Elements and Examples of Action Motions Plus Y2K9
  1.  Headline/Title
  2.  The "Can Opener"
  3.  The Lead
  4.  The Factual Basis
  5.  About the Accused
  6.  The Instructive Element
  7.  The Rule or Statutory Basis
  8.  The State and Federal Constitutional Basis
  9.  Relief
  10.  Attachments
  11. Appropriate Use of an Index
    E.  Litigating Action Motions Plus Y2K9
  Strategic Subpoenas
  Example of ITEMIZED SUBPOENA
  Energized Evidence
    F.  Action Motions Plus Y2K9 Summary
  CONFLICTINEERING Y2K9,  The Introduction
    A.    Defining Conflictineering
    B.  Conflictineering in General
    C.  Enhancing Opportunities for Conflictineering
  1.  Have a Motions Strategy
  2.  Bring Supporters to the Courthouse
  3.  Establish a Reputation for Being Litigious
  4.  Engage Community Leaders
  5.  Encourage the Media's Involvement
  6.  Be Confrontational
  7.  Become Involved in Community Organizing
  8. Numerous Other Ways to Enhance Conflictineering
    D.  The Purpose of Conflictineering
    E.      Preparing for Conflictineering
  1.  Gaining Information
  2.  Subject Matter
  3.  Testing
  4.  Timing
  5.  Financial Considerations
  6.  Written Materials
  7.  Team Concept
  8.  Discussing the Conflictineering Plan
  9.  Flexibility
  10.Goals
  11.Consequences
    F.   Concepts of the Conflictineering Process
    G. How to Begin the Conflictineering Process
    H.     How to End the Conflictineering Process
    I.       The Forums for Conflictineering
    J.       Qualities of People on the Conflictineering Team
    K.   The Gentleness of Conflictineering
    L.      Why Conflictineering Works
  Things Happening Outside the Boxes
    Collaboration
    Information Dissemination
    What's Hot
THE BLACK HOLE OF LITIGATION
  Death Row USA Preface
    The death penalty is part of the political process
    Case study I:  Abraham Beard - - pre-Furman
    Build up of persons on death row
    Case study II: John Spenkelink's Execution
    Case Study III:  Samuel Bice Johnson
    The Lesson Yet Learned
 
    DEATH PENALTY AS PART OF THE POLITICAL PROCESS
    THE PACE: WHAT IT MEANS
    KEY DECISIONS
    WHO DECIDES WHO SHALL LIVE AND WHO SHALL DIE?
    THREE ENTITIES  WHO MONITOR THE PACE
    WHAT  TO DO TO CHANGE THE PACE
    DOING ONE'S DUTY
  Tomorrow What will Happen in the Black Hole of Litigation?
Litigation Misconduct
Guides to Litigation
Example Documents
Technology

  

Click Here to Begin Overview
Click Here to Return to Goextranet.net